Reporting to the Court has come a long way since its inception. Reporters have more resources open to them now. At first they relied solely on stenography machines. Now technology of the 21st century has been integrated into their workflow to make reporters much more efficient than they once were.
The stenograph machine introduced to the reporting world in the year 1913. This machine allowed reporters to press keys on paper scrolls to create characters in code. Whenever a written transcript of the proceeding was required the stenographer would transcribe the text to a document that could be read by the receiving party. The modern standard for court coverage was a mix of stenographic computer documentation and written transcripts.You can learn more at Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters of West Palm Beach
Personal computers had become the latest and biggest emerging technology in the business world during the 1970s, going into the 1980s. Computer-aided transcription (CAT) was introduced which permitted the integration of computers with stenographic machines. Keystrokes could then be registered to the internal memory or external storage unit of the computer while spinning paper rolls were still also being introduced. The saved record can then be computer translated. The court reporter will edit the text when written transcripts are needed, and then make the finalized transcript available for distribution.
With more powerful computers available, CAT systems are capable of processing information at much faster speeds and can translate a digitized record while capturing the record to the device. Unedited text may be presented directly in this way. The court writer should go ahead and render the final record right .. This form of stenography is called stenography in real time.
Also some reporters do voice writing. The court reporter speaks with voice writing into a voice silencer, a hand-held mask with inside a microphone. The reporter repeats the testimony into the handheld mask which then creates the proceeding ‘s audio record. None of the Courtroom participants can hear any of this.
Analog recording technology has enabled tape and other media to capture and preserve the spoken words. Tape recorders were used in court proceedings in the early 1960’s. Magnetic tape was heavily used at the time, and it is still used today by some courts. This is mainly the case where transcripts are not necessary for the proceedings. Audio records are being made more recently to document proceedings. The courtroom must be equipped with the requisite facilities to capture audio and video. This is control of this machinery for those employed in the courtroom. If a copy is needed then a court reporter plays the audio back and transcribes it to create a written record.
Technology for capturing audio and video has evolved and developed much as computers have. Operators can now produce digital recordings of court proceedings that have far more benefits to them than tape. Proceedings recordings can be saved on a computer hard drive or burnt to CD and DVD using digital technology. A court reporter may go through the recording and transcribe the audio to generate the written text as before if a written copy is requested. The equipment used must be strategically placed around the courtroom near the judges, attorneys, witnesses and other parties to effectively capture the audio and video. A dedicated videographer often provides that type of service. They are often employed by agencies that report to court.
One of the latest on-field developments is the use of digital court reporters. A remote audio / video system records the audio and video to a server where the digital court reporter can access it from an offsite facility at their workstation. The digital court reporter will then tag the case number and other relevant information from the proceeding, such as names of the participants and major events.